Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
2003.
The
roots
of
computer
supported
argument
visualization.
In:
Kirschner,
P.A.,
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
Carr,
C.
(Eds.),
Visualizing
Argumentation:
Software
Tools
for
Collaborative
and
Educational
Sense-Making.
Springer,
London,
pp.
3–24.
Buckingham
Shum,
S.
(Ed.),
2005.
Scholarly
Hypermedia,
New
Review
of
Hypermedia
and
Multimedia
(Guest
Editorial,
Special
Issue
on
Scholarly
Hypermedia)
11
(1),
1–6.
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
Hammond,
N.,
1994.
Argumentation-based
design
rationale:
what
use
at
what
cost?
International
Journal
of
Human-
Computer
Studies
40
(4),
603–652.
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
Motta,
E.,
Domingue,
J.,
2000.
ScholOnto:
an
ontology-based
digital
library
server
for
research
documents
and
discourses.
International
Journal
on
Digital
Libraries
3
(3),
237–248.
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
Uren,
V.,
Li,
G.,
Domingue,
J.,
Motta,
E.,
Mancini,
C.,
2002.
Designing
representational
coherence
into
an
infrastructure
for
collective
sensemaking.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
Second
International
Workshop
on
Infrastructures
for
Distributed
Collective
Practices,
San
Diego.
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
Uren,
V.,
Li,
G.,
Domingue,
J.,
Motta,
E.,
2003.
Visualising
internetworked
argumentation.
In:
Kirschner,
P.A.,
Buck-
ingham
Shum,
S.,
Carr,
C.
(Eds.),
Visualizing
Argumentat
ion:
Software
Tools
for
Collaborative
and
Educational
Sense-Making.
Springer,
London,
pp.
185–204.
Bush,
V.,
1945.
As
we
may
think.
The
Atlantic
Monthly
176,
101–108.
Buzan,
T.,
1989.
Use
Your
Head.
BBC
Books,
London.
Carr,
C.S.,
2003.
Using
computer
supported
argument
visualization
to
teach
legal
argumentation.
In:
Kirschner,
P.A.,
Buckingham
Shum,
S.J.,
Carr,
C.S.
(Eds.),
Visualizing
Argumentation:
Software
Tools
for
Collaborative
and
Educational
Sense-Making.
Springer,
London,
pp.
75–96.
Cronin,
B.,
2001.
Bibliometrics
and
beyond:
some
thoughts
on
web-based
citation
analysis.
Journal
of
Information
Science
27
(1),
1–7.
Duncan,
E.B.,
Anderson,
F.D.,
McAleese,
R.,
1981.
Qualified
citation
indexing:
its
relevance
to
educational
technology.
In:
Information
Retrieval
in
Educational
Technology:
Conference
Proceedings
of
the
First
Instruments
of
Cognition
27
Symposium
on
Information
Retrieval
in
Educational
Technology,
ETIC’81,
University
of
Aberd-
een,
Aberdeen,
Scotland.
Engelbart,
D.C.,
1962.
Augmenting
Human
Intellect:
A
Conceptual
Framework.
Stanford
Research
Institute.
Garzone,
M.,
Mercer,
R.E.,
2000.
Towards
an
automated
citation
classifier.
In:
Advances
in
Artificial
Intelligence:
Proceedings
of
the
13th
Biennial
Conference
of
the
Canadian
Society
for
Computational
Studies
of
Intelligence,
AI
2000,
Montre
´
al,
Quebec,
Canada,
May
2000.
Springer,
Berlin.
Gil,
Y.,
Ratnakar,
V.,
2002.
TRELLIS:
an
interactive
tool
for
capturing
information
analysis
and
decision
making.
EKAW
2002,
LNAI
2473.
Green,
T.R.G.,
1990.
Cognitive
dimensions
of
notations.
People
and
Computers
V:
Proceedings
of
the
British
Computer
Society
HCI’89
Conference.
Cambridge
University
Press,
Cambridge.
Gruber,
T.R.,
1993.
Towards
principles
for
the
design
of
ontologies
used
for
knowledge
sharing.
In:
Guarino,
N.,
Poli,
R.
(Eds.),
Formal
Ontology
in
Conceptual
Analysis
and
Knowledge
Representation.
Kluwer
Academic
Publishers,
Dordrecht.
Handschuh,
S.,
Staab,
S.,
2002.
Authoring
and
annotation
of
web
pages
in
CREAM.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
11th
International
World
Wide
Web
Conference
(WWW2002),
Honolulu,
Hawaii.
Kahan,
J.,
Koivunen,
M.-J.,
Prud’Hommeaux,
E.,
Swick,
R.,
2001.
Annotea:
an
open
RDF
infra-structure
for
shared
web
annotations.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
10th
International
Conference
World
Wide
Web
Conference
(WWW10),
Hong
Kong.
Kamp,
H.,
1981.
A
theory
of
truth
and
semantic
representation.
In:
Groendijk,
Janssen,
Stokhof
(Eds.),
Formal
Methods
in
the
Study
of
Language.
Mathematisch
Centrum,
Amsterdam.
Kim,
H.J.,
2000.
Motivations
for
hyperlinking
in
scholarly
electronic
articles:
a
qualitative
study.
Journal
of
the
American
Society
for
Information
Science
51
(10),
887–899.
Kleinberg,
J.M.,
1999.
Authoritative
sources
in
a
hyperlinked
environ-
ment.
Journal
of
the
ACM
46
(5),
604–632.
Knott,
A.,
Mellish,
C.,
1996.
A
data-driven
method
for
classifying
connective
phrases.
Knott,
A.,
Sanders,
T.,
1998.
The
classification
of
coherence
relations
and
their
linguistic
markers:
an
exploration
of
two
languages.
Journal
of
Pragmatics
30,
135–175.
Lassila,
O.,
2001.
Enabling
semantic
web
programming
by
integrating
RDF
and
common
lisp.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
SWWS,
Semantic
Web
Working
Symposium,
Stanford.
Lipetz,
B.-A.,
1965.
Improvement
of
the
selectivity
of
citation
indexes
to
scientific
literature
through
inclusion
of
citation
relationship
indica-
tors.
American
Documentation
16
(2),
81–90.
Mancini,
C.,
2005.
Towards
Cinematic
Hypertext:
A
Theoretical
and
Empirical
Investigation.
IOS
Press,
Amsterdam.
Mancini,
C.,
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
2004.
Towards
‘Cinematic’
Hyper-
text.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
15th
ACM
Conference
on
Hypertext
&
Hypermedia,
Santa
Cruz,
CA,
USA.
Mercer,
R.E.,
Di
Marco,
C.,
2004.
A
design
methodology
for
a
biomedical
literature
indexing
tool
using
the
rhetoric
of
science.
Linking
Biological
Literature,
Ontologies
and
Databases,
HLT-NAACL
2004
Workshop:
Biolink
2004,
Association
for
Computational
Linguistics.
Murugesan,
P.,
Moravcsik,
M.J.,
1978.
Variation
of
the
nature
of
citation
measures
with
journals
and
scientific
specialties.
Journal
of
the
American
Society
for
Information
Science
29
(3),
141–147.
Nanba,
H.,
Okumura,
M.,
1999.
Towards
multi-paper
summarization
using
reference
information.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
16th
International
Joint
Conferences
on
Artificial
Intelligence
(IJCAI
’99),
Stockholm,
Sweden.
Novak,
J.D.,
Gowin,
D.B.,
1984.
Learning
How
to
Learn.
Cambridge
University
Press,
Cambridge.
Page,
L.,
Brin,
S.,
Motwani,
R.,
Winograd,
T.,
1998.
The
PageRank
Citation
Ranking:
Bringing
Order
to
the
Web.
Stanford
University.
Pirolli,
P.,
Card,
S.K.,
1999.
Information
foraging.
Psychological
Review
106
(4),
643–675.
Pool,
I.
de
Sola,
Kochen,
M.,
1978/79.
Contacts
and
influence.
Social
Networks
1,
5–51.
van
Raan,
A.F.J.,
1997.
Scientometrics:
state-of-the-art.
Scientometrics
38
(1),
205–218.
Reich,
Y.,
1994.
Layered
models
of
research
methodologies.
Artificial
Intelligence
for
Engineering
Design,
Analysis
and
Manufacturing
(AI
EDAM)
8
(4),
263–274.
Selvin,
A.M.,
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
2005.
Hypermedia
as
a
productivity
tool
for
doctoral
research.
New
Review
of
Hypermedia
and
Multi-
media
(Special
Issue
on
Scholarly
Hypermedia)
11
(1),
91–101.
Sereno,
B.,
Buckingham
Shum,
S.J.,
Motta,
E.,
2005.
ClaimSpotter:
an
environment
to
support
sensemaking
with
knowledge
triples.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
IUI2005:
ACM
Conference
on
Intelligent
User
Interfaces,
San
Diego.
ACM
Press,
New
York.
Shipman,
F.M.,
Marshall,
C.C.,
1999.
Formality
considered
harmful:
experiences,
emerging
themes,
and
directions
on
the
use
of
formal
representations
in
interactive
systems.
Computer
Supported
Colla-
borative
Work
8
(4),
333–352.
Teufel,
S.,
Moens,
M.,
2000.
What’s
yours
and
what’s
mine:
determining
intellectual
attribution
in
scientific
text.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
Joint
SIGDAT
Conference
on
Empirical
Methods
in
Natural
Language
Processing
and
Very
Large
Corpora.
Teufel,
S.,
Moens,
M.,
2002.
Summarizing
scientific
articles:
experiments
with
relevance
and
rhetorical
status.
Computational
Linguistics
28
(4).
Toulmin,
S.,
1958.
The
Uses
of
Argument.
Cambridge
University
Press,
Cambridge.
Trigg,
R.,
1983.
A
Network-based
Approach
to
Text
Handling
for
the
Online
Scientific
Community.
Department
of
Computer
Science,
University
of
Maryland.
Uren,
V.S.,
Buckingham
Shum,
S.,
Li,
G.,
Domingue,
J.,
Motta,
E.,
2003.
Scholarly
publishing
and
argument
in
hyperspace.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
12th
International
World
Wide
Web
Conference,
WWW2003,
Budapest,
Hungary.
ACM
Press,
New
York.
ARTICLE
I
N
PRES
S
V.
Uren
et
al.
/
Int.
J.
Human-Computer
Studies
64
(2006)
420
–445
444